All translations
Enter a message name below to show all available translations.
Found 3 translations.
| Name | Current message text |
|---|---|
| h English (en) | <p>A sixth possible corneal layer was reported in 2013, with the suggested name Dua's Layer<ref>Dua, Harminder S. et al. (September 2013) Human Corneal Anatomy Redefined: A Novel Pre-Descemet's Layer (Dua's Layer) Ophthalmology <strong>120</strong> (9): 1778-1785 doi: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.018 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.018]</ref>, but other researchers have met the claim "with incredulity" and argued that it is not a new layer but part of the stroma,<ref name=McKee01a>McKee, Hamish D. et al. (May 2014, [http://www.aaojournal.org/article/S0161-6420(13)01227-X/abstract published online February 2014]) Re: Dua et al.: Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet layer (Dua's layer) (Ophthalmology 2013;120:1778–85) Ophthalmology <strong>121</strong> (5): e24-e24 doi: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.021 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.021] "Abstract: We read the recent claim of the discovery of a new corneal layer by Dua et al with incredulity.1 The existence of pre-Descemet stromal tissue remaining after pneumodissection is well known. Their further investigation of this pre-Descemet stroma confirms that it is stroma, and not a new corneal layer."</ref> and have also criticized the choice of the name Dua's Layer.<ref name=McKee02a>McKee, Hamish D. et al. [http://www.anz-cornea-society.org/styled-3/styled-6/files/anz-cornea-society-2014-abstracts.pdf ANZ Cornea Meeting 2014 Abstracts], page 3 "Dua’s layer” is just previously described pre-Descemet stroma ... Medical eponyms have traditionally been created by one’s peers to commemorate the importance of a person’s contribution and findings. Dua has taken an interesting step of creating his own eponym, even before his claims have stood the test of further investigation and scrutiny, and despite current trends to avoid medical eponyms (and when they are used, to use the nonpossessive form). If one prefers a medical eponym to describe the pre-Descemet stroma that remains after pneumodissection, then ‘the Feizi stroma’ would be more appropriate."</ref><ref name=Steinert01a>Steinert, Roger (Medscape, 01 October 2014) [http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/811628 A Controversy in Cornea] "... the purported discovery of a new layer in the cornea ... We all know that today it is quite frowned upon to use names of scientists to describe tissues. It's much more appropriate and helpful to use anatomic terms or physical terms that make sense."</ref></p> |
| h Spanish (es) | <p>En 2013 se reportó la posible existencia de una sexta capa, con la denominación propuesta de membrana de Dua,<ref>Dua, Harminder S. et al. (September 2013) Human Corneal Anatomy Redefined: A Novel Pre-Descemet's Layer (Dua's Layer) Ophthalmology <strong>120</strong> (9): 1778-1785 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.018</ref>, aunque algunos investigadores han tomado esta aseveración «con escepticismo» y alegan que no es una capa nueva, sino parte del estroma,<ref name=McKee01a>McKee, Hamish D. et al. (mayo de 2014, publicado en línea en febrero de 2014) Re: Dua et al.: Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet layer (Dua's layer) (Ophthalmology 2013;120:1778–85) Ophthalmology <strong>121</strong> (5): e24-e24 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.021 «Resumen: Leímos con escepticismo la reciente declaración del descubrimiento de Dua y cols. de una nueva capa corneal. Se sabe que queda estroma residual antes de la capa de Descemet una vez hecha la neumodisección. Su investigación de este estroma pre-Descemet corrobora que es estroma, no una nueva capa corneal».</ref> y también han debatido en nombre propuesto<ref name=McKee02a>McKee, Hamish D. et al. ANZ Cornea Meeting 2014 Abstracts, página 3 «La “capa de Dua” es el ya descrito estroma pre-Descemet […] los epónimos médicos se han creado tradicionalmente como reconocimiento de colegas a los aportes y hallazgos de alguien. Dua ha sacado ventaja creando su propio epónimo, antes de que siquiera sus declaraciones hayan pasado la prueba de la investigación minuciosa y el escrutinio, aunado a la reciente tendencia de evitar los epónimos médicos (y cuando ya están en uso, hacerlo en su forma no posesiva [en inglés]). Si se prefiere el epónimo del estroma remanente del estroma pre-Descemet una vez hecha la neumodisección, “estroma de Feizi” es lo más adecuado».</ref><ref name=Steinert01a>Steinert, Roger (Medscape, 01 October 2014) A Controversy in Cornea «[…] el supuesto descubrimiento de una nueva capa en la córnea […] todos sabemos que actualmente se censura el uso de epónimos para nombrar tejidos. Es más adecuado y útil el empleo de términos anatómicos o físicos que sean acordes».</ref></p> |
| h Korean (ko) | 상피세포층은 나머지 각막을 보호하는 역할을 하며 보우만 층 역시 마찬가지 입니다.<ref>Dua, Harminder S. et al. (September 2013) Human Corneal Anatomy Redefined: A Novel Pre-Descemet's Layer (Dua's Layer) Ophthalmology <strong>120</strong> (9): 1778-1785 doi: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.018 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.018]</ref>, 기질층은 각막 두께의 90% 가량을 차지하며 투명합니다. 두아 층은 각막의 층들 중 가장 최근에 발견된 층으로 2013년도에 개별적인 층일 가능성이 보고 되었으며,<ref name=McKee01a>McKee, Hamish D. et al. (May 2014, [http://www.aaojournal.org/article/S0161-6420(13)01227-X/abstract published online February 2014]) Re: Dua et al.: Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet layer (Dua's layer) (Ophthalmology 2013;120:1778–85) Ophthalmology <strong>121</strong> (5): e24-e24 doi: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.021 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.021] \"Abstract: We read the recent claim of the discovery of a new corneal layer by Dua et al with incredulity.1 The existence of pre-Descemet stromal tissue remaining after pneumodissection is well known. Their further investigation of this pre-Descemet stroma confirms that it is stroma, and not a new corneal layer.\"</ref> 아직 그 기능은 잘 알려지지 않았습니다. 데스메막과 내피세포 층은 각막과 눈의 나머지 부분들 간의 체액과 영영분 흐름을 조절하는 기능을 합니다.<ref name=McKee02a>McKee, Hamish D. et al. [http://www.anz-cornea-society.org/styled-3/styled-6/files/anz-cornea-society-2014-abstracts.pdf ANZ Cornea Meeting 2014 Abstracts], page 3 \"Dua’s layer” is just previously described pre-Descemet stroma ... Medical eponyms have traditionally been created by one’s peers to commemorate the importance of a person’s contribution and findings. Dua has taken an interesting step of creating his own eponym, even before his claims have stood the test of further investigation and scrutiny, and despite current trends to avoid medical eponyms (and when they are used, to use the nonpossessive form). If one prefers a medical eponym to describe the pre-Descemet stroma that remains after pneumodissection, then ‘the Feizi stroma’ would be more appropriate.\"</ref><ref name=Steinert01a>Steinert, Roger (Medscape, 01 October 2014) [http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/811628 A Controversy in Cornea] \"... the purported discovery of a new layer in the cornea ... We all know that today it is quite frowned upon to use names of scientists to describe tissues. It's much more appropriate and helpful to use anatomic terms or physical terms that make sense.\"</ref> |
