Difference between revisions of "F-Scores and Accuracy/zh-hans"
(Created page with "召回率指相同体积里正确添加片段占总共需要添加片段的比例。比如某玩家的召回率是0.9409,那就遗漏了6%的片段。计算时,正确添...") |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
− | + | 召回率指相同体积里正确添加片段占总共需要添加片段的比例。比如某玩家的召回率是0.9409,那就遗漏了6%的片段。计算时,正确添加片段相当于真阳性结果,记为 tp ;遗落的片段相当于假阴性结果 ,记为 fn 。则有如下召回率计算公式:[[File:Recallformula.png|center]] | |
Revision as of 17:05, 21 October 2016
在Eyewire,您将获得基于您的F分数的准确率评级。F分数是决定准确度占准确率和召回这两种统计方法。或者更简单地说,F分数是HQ根据添加多的、缺失的模块来决定你的准确率。传统F分数的公式为:
在计算最终的F分数时,要提前计算好玩家个人的准确率和召回。方块由玩家搭建完后,程序识别并输出4种判断的结果:真阳性、假阳性、真阴性、假阳性。真阳性(tp)是你正确添加了遗失的片段;假阳性(fp)是你错误添加了不该有的片段;真阴性(tn)是你移除原来模型中错误的片段;假阴性(fn)是你遗漏了需要添加的片段。你可以在下图看到假阳性与假阴性的区别。
图中红色片段是假阳性,紫色片段是假阴性。 玩家错误地添加了红色段,而不是区添加紫色片段。 绿色片段正确。
再次说明,准确度是单位体积里正确片段的个数。比如某玩家的准确度是0.9221,那92%片段正确添加,8%片段错误添加。正确添加的片段也就是真阳性,记为 tp ;相应有 fp 。则可以用如下公式计算准确度:
Now we would take the results from both of those formulas and plug them into the formula above to get a player’s F-score. Another way to look at it is we take the harmonic mean of a player’s precision and recall to get their overall accuracy rating.
How Accurate are F-Scores?
One question we a get a lot is how do we know what is correct and what isn’t? What is correct is determined by combining the GrimReaper’s corrections with the EyeWirer consensus. If a cube does not have a GrimReaper correction we just use the EyeWirer consensus. EyeWire consensuses have proven to be quite accurate. However, there is still a small chance that a consensus may contain a wrong piece. This means that F-scores cannot prove user accuracy 100% of the time. However, they are accurate enough that we feel confident using them as a player guide.